How To Increase Speed Of Nas Synology Upload

Dexxer

Hey all,

This problem drives me crazy!

Just bought a DS1621+ on Raid 5. Installed information technology at home on my router.
I have a 1Gbps net fiber connectedness at home.

I installed Synology Drive client on my home computer and my coworker's computer at his place also.
He also has a 1Gbps fiber cyberspace connection at his identify.

Here'southward the very uncomplicated setup:

Nosotros're trying to sync video projects, since we're into video editing. The other twenty-four hour period it took 3 DAYS to sync 600GB of files for a projection.
Upload speed of ii to 3 Mb/south. Insanely slow. It should have accept 4 to 6 hours max, non 3 days...

I used the Drive client using Quickconnect and DDNS, both are slow.
On my router I take ports 5000; 5001; 6690 and 80 forwarded and open.
The NAS is on its own dedicated IP, no DHCP.
Everything wired, no WiFi.

With dropbox using the same config, nosotros use to take 30 to 60Mb/southward transfer between dropbox and our computers and dropbox servers.
At present that I migrated all our data to the NAS, we're getting only 2 to 3Mb/s using the same configuration.
...on a 1Gbps connexion, this is quite frustrating not being able to employ the available bandwidth.

Between PC1 and the NAS I'one thousand getting fourscore to 120Mb/s. It's on the aforementioned router so that's okay.
But between the NAS and PC2... only 2Mb/s. On both DDNS or Quickconnect.

Did lots of test with my ISP, they swear the network works flawlessly at 1Gbps...

Whatever idea what is going on here? Is it Synology bulldoze client app or network or config?

Thanks

WST16

Not sure what's going on, tin can you double cheque that all connections to the router are showing g Mbps/Full duplex.
On the DiskStation, go Control Panel > Network > Network Interface and cheque the LAN interfaces.

Are you syncing a lot of small files or did you attempt one big sized file?

Dexxer

Yup all grand duplex

Its a mix of small and big really, more often than not big files. video files are from 5GB to 50GB each.

WST16

Permit's see if someone else has whatsoever suggestions.

It could be the number of files dumped in the folder. If I were you, I'd examination with a single big sized file (say 5-ten GB), just ane to come across if it makes any difference.

If all fails, the other options that I keep coming across that you might effort are Resilio (it uses the BitTorrent protocol, then you should brand sure it's not blocked by your ISP), and GoodSync. Both are not complimentary.

Seaprobe

Make sure you have the QuickConnect relay server turned off. Information technology will bounciness the traffic through Synology's server. While helpful for getting around NAT, information technology will severely slow throughput.

Rusty

If the results are the aforementioned using QC and DDNS so it's non the relay that'due south the problem IMHO. @Dexxer would y'all be open to a test using a different protocol? Maybe SFTP? Just for a test to see if a different protocol will give different/better results.

WST16

I was even thinking to test information technology by logging in from the remote site to the DS FileStation and to download some big file. @Dexxer is proverb that it's nigh 2Mb/s which is totally unrealistic for a 1Gb fiber.

Dexxer · 6. Dec 2020

Make sure you take the QuickConnect relay server turned off. It will bounce the traffic through Synology's server. While helpful for getting effectually NAT, it volition severely slow throughput.

View attachment 2570

Aye everything about Quickconnect is disabled. I then tried DDNS, that'South what Synology back up team suggested. And information technology did non solve the upshot. This is mysterious. I'thousand wondering if the Isp has some kind of special QoS algorithm to stop dwelling user from doing "pro/business concern" level piece of work from home...

-- post merged: 6. Dec 2020 --

If the results are the same using QC and DDNS and then it'due south not the relay that's the problem IMHO. @Dexxer would y'all be open to a exam using a different protocol? Maybe SFTP? Merely for a exam to see if a dissimilar protocol will give different/better results.

I didn't dare trying SFTP yet, seems a bit advanced.

So I check the SFTP box, port forward port 22 on the router.
Then use fillezilla or WinSCP to connect to my NAS via external IP accost from PC2 at my friend's place.

And then try to drag and drop a 10GB file in there to bank check the speed?

-- postal service merged: half-dozen. Dec 2020 --

I was even thinking to test it past logging in from the remote site to the DS FileStation and to download some big file. @Dexxer is maxim that information technology's about 2Mb/south which is totally unrealistic for a 1Gb fiber.

Achieve to File station via a web browser? and drag and drib a large file within?

Rusty

And and so try to drag and driblet a 10GB file in there to bank check the speed?

Correct

jeyare

just to be sure:
1. Sagemcom Fast 5566 is pure xDSL modem/router
2. known also as Bell HH3300

Q:
are yous sure that you lot have 1Gbps over xDSL it'due south physically doesn't exist include parallel bonding of your coper line by Internet service provider.
Q2:
or do you have FTTH ONU GPON converted to RJ45 and connected into WAN slot?

Dexxer

merely to be sure:
i. Sagemcom Fast 5566 is pure xDSL modem/router
ii. known also as Bell HH3300

Q:
are you certain that you have 1Gbps over xDSL it'due south physically doesn't exist include parallel bonding of your coper line by ISP.
Q2:
or do you lot take FTTH ONU GPON converted to RJ45 and connected into WAN slot?

I have FFTH, fiber is coming out the wall and is connected straight into the router hh3000 via SFP connector I think the back. No RJ45 into the WAN slot. WAN slot is empty.

Here's my ISP speed result's:

Internet-Speed-Test-Measure-the-speed-of-your-Internet-connection.png

PC1 is continued on LAN1 port and my NAS on LAN2

Here'south my iperf3 result for inside network.

Screenshot 2020-12-06 173959.png

And so I know my internal network advice is good.

Now I'm wondering if I tin can run iperf on my colleague's computer at his home, and connect to the NAS to bank check the connexion.

Dexxer

Cant connect via SFTP... every fourth dimension i endeavour it tells me the connection is refused. I went to my friend's dwelling, tried to connect using WinSCP, Fillezilla and CyberDuck, all cant connect :-(

In DSM i activated SFTP via port 22. On my router I made sure port 22 is open and forwarded to my NAS. Even so can't connect using FTP via net.

WST16

Run speed exam (go speedtest. net) locally and ask him to run it at his end too. Have note of the results.

Give the login credentials to your colleague. Just let him/her login similar y'all practise locally (but using DDNS of course), launch FileStation, find i of your video files, right-click on it and choose download and observe what'southward reported by the browser's download info.

Dexxer

Run speed test (go speedtest. net) locally and inquire him to run information technology at his end too. Take note of the results.

Requite the login credentials to your colleague. Only allow him/her login like you do locally (only using DDNS of course), launch FileStation, find one of your video files, right-click on it and choose download and observe what's reported by the browser's download info.

This method gave me 25 to 35mb/south filestation via web browser ddns, not bad. Fashion better than the 2mb/s from Synology drive customer... That is foreign.

As well drive client keeps on disconnecting and saying abnormal status.

WST16

That's good. That's within the range for 1 GB fiber broadband (I expected it to exist in the upper 20s). And to be clear, this is MB/s not Mb/s.

Now we know that you'll need to focus on Bulldoze, since nosotros've proved that the links are doing what they're supposed to practice (send at the advertised speed).

Unfortunately, I'm not using it to sync such amounts. I just use it daily to edit my files (spreadsheets and documents).

However, I'd get back and say, endeavour a single big file in the synced folders. But 1, and run across. I go along reading that Bulldoze becomes very boring when there are a lot of files to sync (peculiarly small files). Not sure if this happens initially until everything is synced and information technology takes off later or is it going to exist similar this.
You'll demand to experiment and exam. Increase the number of files and see what happens when everything is synced and you lot edit a single file, is it going to sync faster.

If all fails, and if this is important for your operation, I'd ditch it and await for a more solid culling (some I've mentioned earlier).

Too drive customer keeps on disconnecting and saying abnormal status.

Try addressing this get-go. Check all the settings. If necessary uninstall and reinstall.
(what a stupid proper noun they choose, trying to search for Drive, almost always, brings hd results).

WST16

Check this, come across if you've overlooked something:

jeyare

back to the WAN findings:
one.
and then yous have ONU GPON (FFTH) managed by really underperforming xDSL router
2. this router can't support two line bonding for VDSL, then must be really weak in packet performance.
3. WAN speed. There is only one fashion how to bank check the existent WAN speed between computers and your NAS = you have to run iPerf container, every bit was recommended

Regarding the test of speed (iperf):
- never use gratuitous servers as iperf target. It'south same as measure your cyberspace speed by Ookla (or like tests) to different Internet service provider gateways = you lot volition get a measurement, simply out of reality.
- you have to set block / packets (k) parameter
- you have to use (F) file parameter too ...it'southward better than really small sized random file.There is also selection to use one of your exchanged large files.

Your Speed test verdict:
- 919/695Mbps this examination (screenshot provided from the router GUI) is the speed from your router to your ISP gateway = clean and unmarried hopped transmission. Defined by your Internet access provider.
- 25 to 35 mbps (equally was written its x8 bigger in real = 200 to 280 Mbps) is just 20% of the download speed. So there is two points of view:
a) your real download speed was in this time really aggregated
b) upload speed of the source (your colleague) is the limited point

Your colleague:
- follow your block scheme he has same router as you
- seems to be same FFTH medium continued into WAN
- seems to be same Internet service provider between you and him
- when same city, and so in that location is a 99% probability of aforementioned Gateway = then just one hop betwixt your router and his router = what is really clean.
Please ostend these assumptions.

When is my consideration right - you and your colleague have one and only limitation = Bong HH3000.

jeyare

minor improver to my consideration:
- upload speed in FFTx is oftentimes performing near by nominal speed = speed of the data product (in aforementioned WAN network). So your colleague upload speed most 200Mbps is really weak only when he has same information production every bit you (NAS location).
- then at that place is another cistron to the consideration near used routers performance

There is no way to find the router specifications regarding network performance most critical points. What is (maybe merely) for me unclear and unacceptable.

Last - router controlled by ISP is really big weakness in data security.

dzunk

I plant this thread looking for answers with extremely slow Synology Drive performance.
I inverse computers in Oct-2020, and since and then, I accept all the same to be able to sync my big backup via bulldoze.
I take a 10G network internally, and it operates at 10G speeds via iSCSI, only at 50MB/sec merely via elevate and drop, and Synology Drive performance is terrible. Even so trouble shooting with Synology back up.
The Sync side of Synology Drive seems to be more responsive that the backup.
Synology Drive sync picks upward new files extremely fast, but if I change the name or update the file, Synology Drive takes awhile to get back to the files to update. This may be due to the large amount of resyncing with my fill-in that is ongoing.
My point is, Synology Drive does not seem to be performance very well correct now. I am not sure if this has always been an upshot or a alter since the latest DSM updates. Information technology seems to but sync 500 files/sec at a time without any file transfer. I am using a DS1817+ and DS1621+.
While the Bell HH3000 may be a clogging, I recommend looking at another sync solution.
Accept you lot tried the File request from FileStation?
Encounter if you lot get better results past creating a download link to your colleague for initial file transfer, then send a files request for your colleague to add new files.
This is how I work with clients and outsourced editing.
This means your colleague will not be working directly on your DS1621+ but downloading and uploading information.

jeyare

The Sync side of Synology Drive seems to exist more than responsive that the backup.
Synology Bulldoze sync picks up new files extremely fast, but if I change the proper noun or update the file, Synology Bulldoze takes awhile to get back to the files to update. This may be due to the big amount of resyncing with my fill-in that is ongoing.
My point is, Synology Bulldoze does non seem to exist functioning very well right now. I am not sure if this has e'er been an event or a change since the latest DSM updates. It seems to but sync 500 files/sec at a time without whatever file transfer. I am using a DS1817+ and DS1621+.

Q: just to be sure (lost in the described issue) - in case of the "backup" - are you thinking about Drive Backup? From Win Os surround? Synced past Drive to the NAS over LAN?
-----

I have a 10G network internally, and it operates at 10G speeds via iSCSI, but at 50MB/sec simply via elevate and drop, and Synology Drive performance is terrible.

Q: about iSCSI - you must mean LAN 10G performance. What is a standard sample of synced bunch of files for the Syno Drive? Both exactly same samples tested in iSCSI LUN and Drive as well?

to be sure: iSCSI uses different transfer protocol than Drive (iSCSI is one of fastest in your NAS compages)
for the LAN usage second fastest is NFS
then last is SMB (bereft setup on both sides is frequently a reason of terrible performance)

for heavy (large capacity) file transfer is better use different aqueduct than Bulldoze (as was described above)... e.chiliad. direct transfer by NFS (but you need W Enterprise version). Only don't utilise SMB and NFS for transfers to same Share target, it'southward a disaster. For dissimilar than Enterprise version you have to apply 3rd party Win NFS clients.

I take also plan to exam this way:

How To Increase Speed Of Nas Synology Upload

Dexxer

Dexxer

Seaprobe

Dexxer

Dexxer

Dexxer

Dexxer

dzunk

0 Response to "How To Increase Speed Of Nas Synology Upload"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel